
40 Mind-Bending Then-And-Now Pictures Of Places That Prove Time Waits For No One
Interview With ExpertThe world around us is constantly changing, but we might not notice how much it actually transforms when we’re in the midst of all of it. It’s only when we compare photos taken in the past and the present that the contrast between the two becomes obvious.
To draw your attention to how much we have progressed, Bored Panda compiled a list of then-and-now photos that show how dramatically our surroundings have changed. Scroll down to find them below, and don’t forget to upvote those you found the most surprising.
While you're at it, be sure to check out a conversation with photographers Mark Klett and Garry Pycroft, who dabble in then-and-now photography, called rephotography, and kindly agreed to share more about it.
This post may include affiliate links.
Pyramid Of The Sun In Teotihuacan, Mexico. 1900 vs. 2023
And some still say these people were "primitive." Try that today without modern building equipment.
Caerphilly Castle, Caerphilly, South Wales. 1855 vs. 2024
The Ruins Of Tikál, Guatemala. 1890 vs. 2023
The images in this list that compare the same place in two different moments in time are called rephotographs. They provide us with a then-and-now view of the same site and allow us to document the changes that are happening for various purposes.
To know more about this fascinating kind of photography, we reached out to photographers Mark Klett and Garry Pycroft, who dabble in then-and-now photography, and they kindly agreed to share their experience with us.
Noorabad Bridge, Morena, India. 1829 vs. 2010
You know, I don't know what it is exactly, but I have the strangest feeling that the first image isn't actually a photo :p
Tokyo Station - 1914 vs. 2023
Eilean Donan Castle, Taken Sometime Before 1911 vs. 2020
Pycroft starts by explaining that there are two types of fundamental approaches to rephotography. The first is quite straightforward—the image connects two photos, one before and one after. Meanwhile, the second is more artistic—it blends the two images to create the appearance of the past being in today's environment.
"My images fall into category 2. I should also state that I consider myself probably the most travelled "rephotographer" in the world. My website, Voyageur Du Passe, shows my images from the USA, Canada, the UK, France, Hungary, and Switzerland."
Mortuary Temple Of Hatshepsut, Luxor, Egypt. 1880 vs. 2022
I went there. It a sight to behold. You walk up this long pathway so you start from a distance, it’s a breathtaking sight
Sagrada Familia, Barcelona. 1930 vs. 2020
Hiroshima, Japan. 1945 vs. 2006
Though that shouldn't be an example that nukes aren't destructive longterm - Terrain and the weather back then were huge factors in clearing the radiation in a relative short time
Pycroft decided to dabble in rephotography because he simply loves the entire process.
Whereas photographer Mark Klett tells us that what drew him to rephotography is the curiosity about what has happened to the scene or place shown in an older photograph.
"What has changed, and what does it look like now? It’s a kind of time warp to stand in the same place where a historical photograph was made long ago. It’s an often unexpected and eye-opening experience."
Moai Statues In Rano Raraku, Easter Island. 1914 vs. 2019
Norway, Hellesylt 1885 vs. 2016
Outdoor Theater, Bucharest, Romania. 1916 vs. 2016
The photographers tell us that the whole rephotography process essentially encompasses finding where the original photograph was made and making a new photograph from the same exact spot.
"Exactness and skill in relocating the location can make the difference in how convincing the rephotograph looks," notes Klett.
"Also important can be trying to match the original picture’s lighting, time of day, and year. A kind of visual detective work is often needed to do this kind of work with accuracy."
Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., U.S. 1917 vs 2020
DC has always been a swamp. And when I say that I'm not referring to the MAGA slogan. That part of the USA was literally a swamp. Or wetland if you prefer. I wonder why they decided to put the US capitol there. Could have had New York or Boston or Philly. I wonder what the founding fathers were thinking.
Seoul, South Korea In 1900 vs. 2016
Such a vibrant city. I was only there briefly, I'd like to see more of it
Roman Baths And Abbey, England. 1890 vs. 2024
Meanwhile, Pycroft differentiates 3 stages to producing such images:
"The discovery phase: this is where I search for old postcards of the location I intend to visit. I also need to research if the old buildings still exist and their exact location within the target town.
The on-site photography: I am excited when I find the building and realize that I can photograph it. Many times, the opportunity cannot be completed, maybe due to trees and shrubs masking the site or renovations that hide the building.
The creative phase is where I merge the two images together. And the joy it brings when I see that I've accomplished another image," he shares.
Seljestadjuvet In Odda, Norway. 1905 vs. 2022
That tunnel looks amazing and a little scary, but I'd go through it!
Machu Picchu In 1912 After Major Clearing Work Had Been Undertaken vs. 2023
Los Angeles In 1880 vs. 2019
They had all that space, endless possibilities. And they ended up building that car dependent monstrosity
When it comes to the significance of rephotography, Klett says that "the process can show changes that have occurred over time, but the pictures alone can’t explain the reasons for change. The process can also tell us something about how individual photographers made choices and decisions about what and how to make their photographs."
"I've completed several exhibitions here in France, and a consistent theme is that it highlights the heritage that remains in the town," adds Pycroft. "Very often I hear locals complaining about how the town has changed, but my images show that maybe there has been quite a change, but there still remains a beauty in the town. And it highlights some of the history to be found."
Buddahs Of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. 1963 vs. 2008
From 544 & 591 CE they endured, until blown up by the Taliban in 2001.
Ponte Vecchio In Florence, Italy. 1965 vs. 2019
End Of Great Wall, Shanhai Pass, China. 1930 vs. 2008
Back in the 1960s, we were taught in school that it was visible to the eye from space. I was oddly disappointed when that proved to be false.
Lastly, we couldn't let the photographers go without asking about their most memorable rephotography project they've done.
"The one that comes to mind is one I created of a local village, and in the photograph, we see a mother with her young daughter. At the exhibition of the event, an elderly lady approached me and told me that the young girl was here and she was there with her mother, and her father was the photographer. She had tears in her eyes when she saw the image," Pycroft fondly recalls.
Magnesia Ad Maeandrum, Anatolia, Turkey. 1984 vs. 2013
The fact that they knew the stadium was there is impressive in itself. I believe it's fully excavated now and looks impressive.
Odeon Of Herodes Atticus, Located On The Southwest Slope Of The Acropolis Of Athens, Greece. 1893 vs. 2001
The Peruvudaiyar Kovil Or Brihadeeswarar Temple, India. 1880 vs. 2016
"I have made many landscape rephotographs, and sometimes I like the ones that show that little has changed even after one hundred years or more. Together, they challenge the concept of time passing," says Klett.
"I also like to experiment with the methods used to make rephotographs. It’s not always the most interesting thing to do - to make basic rephotographs. It’s sometimes more interesting to combine images made at different times into one larger document of the space, and this is now possible using digital techniques."
Stonehenge In Wiltshire, England. Then vs. 2019
Togetsukyo Bridge, Kyoto, Japan. 1870 vs. Now
The Parthenon, Athens. 1900 vs. 2022
Milan Cathedral, Italy. 1938 vs. 2016
It's mostly unchanged, all the parts damaged from the war have been rebuilt. The company founded in 1387 by Duke Gian Galeazzo Visconti, the Veneranda Fabbrica del Duomo- is still existing and active, taking care of the upkeep, renovations and repairs of the stone work. The marble all comes from a single cave in Candoglia, that has been active since 1380 and works almost exclusively for the Fabbrica: it's curious that the marble is pinkish at origin, and turns white-grey with time. To bring the Marble from the caves to the city a shipping channel was built, that is also still existing, with the old paths used to drive oxens to pull the empty barges upriver now converted to beautiful bike paths.
Arch Of Constantine, Rome, Italy. 1896 vs. 2022
Golden Gate Bridge In San Francisco, California. 1934 vs. 2017
When it was opened in 1937 over 200k pedestrians walked, danced and skated across. 50 years later in 1987 over 800k people walked across for the anniversary causing it to sag which, was by design and not a sign that the bridge was overstressed.
Piramide Cestia And Porta San Paolo In Rome, Italy. 1920 vs. 2012
From Wikipedia: The pyramid of Cestius (in Italian, Piramide di Caio Cestio or Piramide Cestia) is an ancient Roman pyramid in Rome, Italy, near the Porta San Paolo and the Protestant Cemetery. It was built in the style of the Nubian pyramids as a tomb for Gaius Cestius, a member of the Epulones religious corporation.[1] It stands at a fork between two ancient roads, the Via Ostiensis and another road that ran west to the Tiber along the approximate line of the modern Via Marmorata. Due to its incorporation into the city's fortifications, it is today one of the best-preserved ancient buildings in Rome.
Seoul City Gates, Korea. 1910 vs. 2024
Perspective makes it look much bigger in the first image.
Eiffel Tower In Paris, France. 1889 vs. 2025
A recent post quoted a genius who said that the French stole "our" design, because of course the original is in Las Vegas!
Reichstag In Berlin, Germany. 1900 vs. 2024
Mmm. The building was heavily modified after 1900 and before taking up its current form. There were some striking architectural changes made in 1945, for example. 😬
Malabar Hill - Panorama Of Bombay, India. 1860 vs. 2021
Statue Of Liberty In Liberty Island, New York City. 1927 vs. 2014
Fun fact: The star shaped structure it's on, wasn't built for the statue. Rather, that is Fort Wood, which was built between 1808, and 1811, and served as part of the harbor defense for New York. the odd shape was to allow for overlapping fields of fire from muskets and cannon. When the statue site was proposed, it was decided to fill in the interior of Fort Wood with backfill taken from around NYC, and then have block and concrete placed to create the walkway area, with the backfill serving to provide a more stable footing for the statue and its upper plinth works.
Copacabana Beach In Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. 1930 vs. 2022
If you didn't read the title and immediately start singing that song in your head, are you even human?
Cairo, Egypt. 1870 vs. 2019
Oops, I thought that was the Blue Mosque in Istanbul - does anyone know the name of the building in the top image?
Pennsylvania Station In New York, United States. 1911 vs. 2007
Times Square In New York, United States. 1980 vs. 2023
You can't see all the prostitutes and pimps in the first image but they're there!
These were cool! More like this and animals and less "celebrity" junk please
These were cool! More like this and animals and less "celebrity" junk please